Jump to content

Talk:Mohammad Reza Pahlavi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former good article nomineeMohammad Reza Pahlavi was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 21, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
February 25, 2018Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

References

[edit]

As I'm reading the article, I'm very surprised by how much information is being cited from Abbas Milani. This is an individual with an axe to grind against the Shah, so it would be nice if someone could find sources from other individuals to get a more balanced history of events. 47.198.212.71 (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Balanced" history of events? At least in terms of the introduction section, the article is heavily biased in favor of the Shah. The introduction suddenly shifts from only listing his positive policy accomplishments to suddenly his ousting during the Iranian Revolution, creating the false impression that the Iranian people had no good reason to force him out of power. There is no discussion of his secret police and their gross human rights violations, and the introduction fails to cite the many internal and exogenous geopolitical factors (e.g. collaboration with Western powers to consolidate his authoritarian rule) that contributed to the Shah's overthrow. 69.250.247.132 (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My edit

[edit]

Greetings and felicitations. I just made a significant edit to the article. Please let me know if there's something about that edit that you would like to discuss. —DocWatson42 (talk) 22:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article biased towards Shah and his policies

[edit]

The introduction section of this article has persisted in reading like propagandistic hagiography in favor of the Shah. Its replete with a simplistic summary of his "good" policies but makes no reference to the massive oppression and rights abuses perpetrated by his regime. Nor does it place the positive aspects of the Shah's economic reforms in the context of his pro-Western ambitions, with the latter having played a formative role in the Iranian Revolution to depose him. Needs to be rewritten. 69.250.247.132 (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]